Under the Community Infrastructure Tax Regulations, any authority that receives a development contribution through the Section 106 levy or planning obligations must prepare an infrastructure funding statement. County councils are part of it. Section 106 is a legal agreement between an applicant applying for a building permit and the local planning authority, which is used to mitigate the impact of your new home on the local community and infrastructure. In other words, a new house means a different car on the streets and maybe your kids will visit nearby schools, which will weigh a little more heavily on local services. Authorized development should, by its very nature, be planningly acceptable, so that planning obligations would generally not be necessary. Planning obligations that have been made should be limited only to issues requiring prior authorization and should not, for example, include contributions for affordable housing. Section 106 of the agreements are developed when it is considered that a development will have a significant impact on the territory, which cannot be mitigated by conditions related to a decision to approve the plan. “205. When commitments are sought or revised, local planning authorities should take into account changes in market conditions over time and, if necessary, be flexible enough to prevent the planned development from becoming bogged down.” The authorities may collect a monitoring fee in accordance with Section 106 of the planning obligations to cover the monitoring and reporting costs associated with the provision of this obligation in accordance with Section 106.
Monitoring fees can be used to monitor and report on any type of planning obligation for the duration of this obligation. Monitoring fees should not be requested retroactively for historical agreements. Legal audits of the date of use of a s106 agreement are set out in Regulations 122 and 123 of the 2010 EU Infrastructure Tax Regulation, as amended. The government`s guidelines on the implementation of planning obligations are Gov.uk presented. Local planning authorities must take these guidelines into account in their planning request decisions and have good reason to deviate from them. This means that, subject to the completion of the three tests under REGULATION 122 of the CIL, pricing authorities may use funds from both the levy and the planning obligations of Section 106 to pay for the same infrastructure element, regardless of the number of planning obligations that have already contributed to an infrastructure element. Many AEAs are now calling for a declaration on affordable housing to be submitted with a planning request. It is not the same as a viability report. It is simply a calculation of the largest contribution to affordable housing, necessary by determined planning policies. We can create a low-cost return and, at the same time, advise on whether it is worthwhile to establish a future sustainability report to reduce or eliminate the amount of affordable housing you need to provide. Section 106 (S106) of the Planning Act 1990 allows us, as a local planning authority, to enter into a legally binding agreement or planning obligation with a landowner as part of the granting of the building permit. The commitment is called the agreement section 106.
If you are planning to build, contact your local authority and review their approach to contributions to Section 106. The majority sticks to the derogation, but some of them who have adopted a recently adopted local plan may have a different view. These agreements allow us to enter into a legally binding planning obligation with a developer in the context of granting the building permit.